Development of an Integral Index of Loaded Walking Based on Biomechanical and Electromyographic Parameters
https://doi.org/10.32603/1993-8985-2025-28-6-108-120
Abstract
Introduction. Walking with additional load, such as a backpack, weights, or specialized equipment, has a significant effect on the musculoskeletal system. Carrying extra weight increases the load on the lower limb joints, enhances muscular activity, and modifies the spatiotemporal characteristics of gait, which is accompanied by increased energy expenditure. Notably, these effects depend not only on the mass but also on the distribution of the load. Contemporary studies are increasingly employing the integration of biomechanical, kinetic, and electromyographic data to quantitatively assess the body’s adaptation mechanisms to external loading. The development of integrated metrics for loaded walking is relevant for objective characterization of the biomechanical cost of different loading conditions, being promising for application in sports science, ergonomics, military training, and clinical practice.
Aim. To develop an integral index that quantitatively reflects changes in human gait under two external loads: 3 kg attached to the lower legs and 12 kg evenly distributed in a backpack. A functional analysis of loaded human gait, represented by a set of biomechanical and electromyographic parameters, was carried out.
Materials and methods. Seven healthy volunteers were subjected to examination using the methods of 3D optical motion capture and simultaneous surface electromyography from seven muscle groups. The primary trajectories were processed in QTM, exported to TXT/TSV, and further organized by Python scripts. The aggregated values (maximum, minimum, ROM) were automatically transferred to Excel. Inter-parameter dependencies were examined using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. The statistical significance of individual changes was assessed using the Friedman test followed by cluster analysis.
Results. An integral index (I_total) using global min–max normalization and equal weighting of the selected metrics was developed.
Conclusion. Distal loading increases double-support time and decreases step frequency, whereas proximal loading alters muscle activation patterns and pelvic positioning, partially normalizing spatiotemporal gait parameters. The proposed integral index combines changes in biomechanical and EMG parameters, enabling a quantitative assessment of the biomechanical cost associated with the applied load.
Keywords
About the Authors
V. K. RyzhovRussian Federation
Viktor K. Ryzhov, Master's degree in Instrumentation Engineering (2025)
5 F, Professor Popov St., St Petersburg 197022
E. M. Skrebova
Russian Federation
Elena M. Skrebova, Specialist in Engineering in Medical and Biological Practice (2015), Head of the Research Laboratory "Motion Capture and Modeling Systems"
5 F, Professor Popov St., St Petersburg 197022
A. M. Boronahin
Russian Federation
Alexander M. Boronakhin, Dr Sci. (Eng.) (2013), Professor (2020) of the Department of Laser Measurement and Navigation Systems, Dean of the Faculty of Information Measurement and Biotechnical Systems
5 F, Professor Popov St., St Petersburg 197002
I. A. Sakun
Russian Federation
Ivan A. Sakun, Master's degree in Instrumentation Engineering (2024), Research Engineer of the Laboratory of Movement Physiology; Junior Researcher of the Research Laboratory "Motion Capture and Modeling Systems" and Postgraduate Student
6, Makarova Emb., St Petersburg 199034
D. B. Popov
Russian Federation
Dmitry B. Popov, Master's degree in Instrumentation Engineering (2024); Junior Researcher of the Laboratory of Vision Physiology; Junior Researcher of the Research Laboratory "Motion Capture and Modeling Systems" and Postgraduate Student
6, Makarova Emb., St Petersburg 199034
References
1. Künzler M., Herger S., De Pieri E., Egloff C., Mündermann A., Nüesch C. Effect of Load Carriage on Joint Kinematics, Vertical Ground Reaction Force and Muscle Activity: Treadmill Versus Overground Walking. Gait & Posture. 2023, vol. 104, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.05.018
2. Hu X., Jia L., Tang J., Duan Q., Chen C., Zhao Z., Qu X. Effects of Backpack Load on Spatiotemporal Turning Gait Parameters. Intern. J. of Industrial Ergonomics. 2023, vol. 95, art. no. 103443. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103443
3. Tilbury-Davis D. C., Hooper R. H. The Kinetic and Kinematic Effects of Increasing Load Carriage Upon the Lower Limb. Human Movement Science. 1999, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 693–700.
4. Majumdar D., Sudan Pal M., Pramanik A., Majumdar D. Kinetic Changes in Gait During Low Magnitude Military Load Carriage. Ergonomics. 2013, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1278–1287. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.835871
5. Liew B., Morris S., Netto K. The Effect of Backpack Carriage on the Biomechanics of Walking: A Systematic Review and Preliminary Meta-Analysis. J. of Applied Biomechanics. 2016, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 614–629. doi: 10.1123/jab.2015-0339
6. Skinner H. B., Barrack R. L. Ankle Weighting Effect on Gait in Able-Bodied Adults. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1990, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 112–115.
7. Mullins A. K., Annett L. E., Drain J. R., Kemp J. G., Clark R. A., Whyte D. G. Lower Limb Kinematics and Physiological Responses to Prolonged Load Carriage in Untrained Individuals. Ergonomics. 2015, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 770–780. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.984775
8. Sturdy J. T., Rizeq H. N., Silder A., Sessoms P. H., Silverman A. K. Walking Slope and Heavy Backpack Loads Affect Torso Muscle Activity and Kinematics. J. of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2023, vol. 70, art. no. 102769. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102769
9. Tomal P., Fryzowicz A., Skorupska E., Dworak L. B. Influence of School Backpack Load as a Variable Affecting Gait Kinematics among Seven-Year-Old Children. Intern. J. of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022, vol. 19, no. 7, art. no. 3843. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073843
10. Birrell S. A., Hooper R. H., Haslam R. A. The Effect of Military Load Carriage on Ground Reaction Forces. Gait & Posture. 2007, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 611–614. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.008
11. Oberhofer K., Wettenschwiler P. D., Singh N., Ferguson S. J., Annaheim S., Rossi R. M., Lorenzetti S. The Influence of Backpack Weight and Hip Belt Tension on Movement and Loading in the Pelvis and Lower Limbs during Walking. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics. 2018, vol. 2018, art. no. 4671956. doi: 10.1155/2018/4671956
12. Ahmad H. N., Barbosa T. M. The Effects of Backpack Carriage on Gait Kinematics and Kinetics of Schoolchildren. Scientific Reports. 2019, vol. 9, art. no. 3364, pp. 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40076-w
13. Orr R. M., Johnston V., Coyle J., Pope J. Reported Load Carriage Injuries of the Australian Army Soldier. J. of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2015, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 316–322. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9540-7
14. Qualisys Track Manager. Available at: https://www.qualisys.com/ (accessed: 18.09.2025).
15. Stegeman D. F., Hermens H. J. Standards for surface electromyography: the European project "Surface EMG for non-invasive assessment of muscles (SENIAM)". 2007. 112 p. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265073104_Standards_for_surface_electromyography_The_European_project_Surface_EMG_for_non-invasive_assessment_of_muscles _SENIAM (accessed: 18.09.2025).
16. Leardini A., Sawacha Z., Paolini G., Ingrosso S., Nativo R., Benedetti M. G. A New Anatomically Based Protocol for Gait Analysis in Children. Gait & Posture. 2007, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 560–571. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.018
17. Visual3D. Available at: https://www.target3d.co.uk/has-motion (accessed: 18.09.2025).
18. Wang S., Qian Z., Liu X., Song G., Jiang Z., Wang K., Wu J., Liu J., Ren L., Ren L. Effects of Additional Weight-Bearing on the in Vivo Kinematics of the Human Ankle Joint Complex During Walking. Scientific Reports. 2024, vol. 14, art. no. 29049. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80716-4
Review
For citations:
Ryzhov V.K., Skrebova E.M., Boronahin A.M., Sakun I.A., Popov D.B. Development of an Integral Index of Loaded Walking Based on Biomechanical and Electromyographic Parameters. Journal of the Russian Universities. Radioelectronics. 2025;28(6):108-120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/1993-8985-2025-28-6-108-120
JATS XML




























