Experimental Study of Coherent Collaborative Processing Method in Distributed Automotive Radar

Introduction. Intelligent driver assistance systems are increasingly employing radar systems to detect, resolve, and track various classes of targets. The use of MIMO-based distributed systems allow the characteristics of object resolution by angle to be significantly improved. However, this is associated with the difficulty to ensure a coherent mode of processing data entering from two or more radar systems. This work compares a millimeter wavelength range radar system with improved angular resolution with a monostatic system. The issue of ensuring synchronization of radars comprising the system under study is addressed.

Aim. To increase the angular resolution of a distributed radar system with tandem coherent signal processing of two MIMO radars.

Materials and methods. The resolution of a system consisting of two spaced radars was investigated experimentally using a fully functional layout. Algorithms for phase synchronization and collaborative digital signal processing, along with appropriate software, were developed.

Results. The use of a common external reference signal source in MIMO radars makes it possible to implement a coherent system operation mode. Placement of two spaced MIMO radars ensures the formation of a bistatic virtual antenna array, which doubles the angle resolution, compared with a radar whose number of receiving channels is two times smaller than the size of a bistatic virtual array.

Conclusion. The conducted experimental studies demonstrated an increase in angular coordinate resolution during the formation of a bistatic virtual antenna array. The use of an external reference generator ensures the coherent operation of two radars, improving the accuracy of mutual phase synchronization in the channels of bistatic subarrays by several degrees.

1. Winner H., Hakuli S., Lotz F., Singer C. Automotive RADAR. Handbook of Driver Assistance Systems. Basic Information, Components and Systems for Active Safety and Comfort. Cham, Springer, 2016, pp. 325–403. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-12352-3_17

2. Waldschmidt C., Hasch Ju., Menzel W. Automotive Radar – From First Efforts to Future Systems. IEEE J. of Microwaves. 2021, vol. 1, iss. 1, pp. 135–148. doi: 10.1109/JMW.2020.3033616

3. Burov V. N., Kuzin A. A., Myakinkov A. V., Pluzhnikov A. D., Ryndyk A. G., Fadeev R. S., Shabalin S. A., Rogov P. S. Development of the Automotive Radar for the Systems of Adaptive Cruise Control and Automatic Emergency Breaking. Proc. of 2019 Intern. Conf. on Engineering and Telecommunication (EnT), Dolgoprudny, Russia, 20–21 Nov. 2019. IEEE, 2019. doi: 10.1109/EnT47717.2019

4. Kuzin A. A., Miakinkov A. V., Shabalin S. A. Design Features of Antenna Arrays of Automotive Radars Based on Transmitting and Receiving MultiElement Modules. J. of the Russian Universities. Radioelectronics. 2021, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 39–48. (In Russ.) doi: 10.32603/1993-8985-2021-24-3-39-48

5. Artyukhin I. V. High-resolution 2D-DoA Sequential Algorithm of Azimuth and Elevation Estimation in Automotive Distributed System of Coherent MIMO Radars. Russian Technological J. 2024, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 65−77. doi: 10.32362/2500-316X-2024-12-3-65-77

6. Gottinger M., Hoffmann M., Christmann M., Schütz M., Kirsch F., Gulden P., Vossiek M. Coherent Automotive Radar Networks the Next Generation of Radar-Based Imaging and Mapping. IEEE J. of Microwaves. 2021, vol. 1, iss. 1, pp. 149–163. doi: 10.1109/JMW.2020.3034475

7. Steiner M., Osman K. S., Waldschmidt C. Cooperative Target Detection in a Network of SingleChannel Radar Sensors. GeMiC, Stuttgart, Germany, 25–27 March 2019. IEEE, 2019. doi: 10.23919/GEMIC.2019.8698131

8. Frischen A., Hakobyan G., Waldschmidt C. Coherent Measurements with MIMO Radar Networks of Incoherent FMCW Sensor Nodes. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Let. 2020, vol. 30, iss. 7, pp. 721–724. doi: 10.1109/LMWC.2020.2998081

9. Oprisan D., Rohling H. Tracking Systems for Automotive Radar Networks. RADAR. 2002. Edinburgh, UK, 15–17 Oct. 2002. IEEE, 2002. doi: 10.1109/RADAR.2002.1174714

10. Fölster F., Rohling H., Lübbert U. An Automotive Radar Network Based On 77GHz FMCW Sensors. IEEE Intern. Radar Conf., Arlington, USA, 09–12 May 2005. IEEE, 2005.doi: 10.1109/RADAR.2005.1435950

11. Meinecke B., Steiner M., Schlichenmaier J., Hasch J., Waldschmidt C. Coherent Multistatic MIMO Radar Networks Based on Repeater Tags. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. 2019, vol. 67, iss. 9, pp. 3908–3916. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2019.2916796

12. Werbunat D., Meinecke B., Schweizer B., Hasch J., Waldschmidt C. OFDM-Based Radar Network Providing Phase Coherent DOA Estimation. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. 2021, vol. 69, iss. 1, pp. 325–336. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2020.3026041

13. Donnet B., Longstaff I. D. MIMO Radar, Techniques and Opportunities. European Radar Conf., Manchester, UK, 13–15 Sept. 2006. IEEE, 2006, pp. 112–115. doi: 10.1109/EURAD.2006.280286

14. Li Jian, Petre Stoica. MIMO Radar Signal Processing. New Jersey, Wiley-IEEE Press, 2008, 472 p.

15. Epperson J. F. An Introduction to Numerical Methods and Analysis. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 2002, 556 p.