Nonparametric Bayesian Networks as a Tool of Multiscale Time Series Analysis and Remote Sensing Data Integration

Introduction. Nonparametric Bayesian networks are a promising tool for analyzing, visualizing, interpreting and predicting the structural and dynamic characteristics of complex systems. Modern interdisciplinary research involves the complex processing of heterogeneous data obtained using sensors of various physical nature. In the study of the forest fund, both methods of direct dendrological measurements and methods of remote observation using unmanned aerial vehicles are widely used. Information obtained using these methods must be analyzed in conjunction with hydrometeorological monitoring data.
Aim. Investigation of the possibility of automating the monitoring of the well-being of the forest fund based on the integration of ground survey data, remote multispectral measurements and hydrometeorological observations using the mathematical apparatus of nonparametric Bayesian networks.
Materials and methods. To assess the long-term joint dynamics of natural and climatic indicators and the radial growth of trees, a modified method of multiscale cross-correlation analysis was used with the removal of the background trend described by the moving average model. Relationships between various indicators were estimated based on the unconditional and conditional nonparametric Spearman correlation coefficients, which were used to reconstruct and parameterize the nonparametric Bayesian network.
Results. A multiscale nonparametric Bayesian network was constructed to characterize both unconditional and conditional statistical relationships between parameters obtained from remote sensing, hydroclimatic and dendrological measurements. The proposed model showed a good quality of the plant fund state forecasting. The correlation coefficients between the observed and predicted indicators exceed 0.6, with the correlation coefficient comprising 0.77 when predicting the growth trend of annual tree rings.
Conclusion. The proposed nonparametric Bayesian network model reflects the relationship between various factors that affect the forest ecosystem. The Bayesian network can be used to assess risks and improve environmental management planning.

1. Terefenko P., Paprotny D., Giza A., MoralesNápoles O., Kubicki A., Walczakiewicz S. Monitoring Cliff Erosion with LiDAR Surveys and Bayesian Network-Based Data Analysis. Remote Sens. 2019, no. 11, p. 843. doi: 10.3390/rs11070843

2. Paprotny D., Morales-Nápoles O. Estimating Extreme River Discharges in Europe Through a Bayesian Network. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2017, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 2615–2636. doi: 10.5194/hess-21-2615-2017

3. Delgado-Hernández D.-J., Morales-Nápoles O., De-León-Escobedo D., Arteaga-Arcos J.-C. A Continuous Bayesian Network for Earth Dams’ Risk Assessment: An Application. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering. 2014, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 225–238. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2012.731416

4. Morales Nápoles O., Steenbergen R. Analysis of Axle and Vehicle Load Properties through Bayesian Networks Based on Weigh-in-Motion Data. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2014, vol. 125, pp. 153–164. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.01.018

5. Cooke R. M., Wielicki B. Probabilistic Reasoning about Measurements of Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity: Combining Disparate Lines of Evidence. Climatic Change. 2018, no. 151, pp. 541–154. doi: 10.1007/s10584-018-2315-y

6. Weber P., Medina-Oliva G., Simon C., Iung B. Overview on Bayesian Network Applications for Dependability, Risk Analysis and Maintenance Areas. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2012, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 671–682. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2010.06.002

7. Hanea A., Morales Nápoles O., Ababei D. Nonparametric Bayesian Networks: Improving Theory and Reviewing Applications. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2015, vol. 144, pp. 265–284. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.027

8. Morales O., Kurowicka D., Roelen A. Eliciting Conditional and Unconditional Rank Correlations from Conditional Probabilities. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2008, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 699–710. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.020

9. Baba K., Shibata R., Sibuya M. Partial Correlation and Conditional Correlation as Measures of Conditional Independence. Australian & New Zealand J. of Statistics. 2004, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 657–664. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2004.00360.x

10. Baba K., Sibuya M. Equivalence of Partial and Conditional Correlation Coefficients. J. of the Japan Statistical Society. 2005, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–19. doi: 10.14490/JJSS.35.1

11. Yuan N., Fu Z., Zhang H., Piao L., Luterbacher J. Detrended Partial-Cross-Correlation Analysis: A New Method for Analyzing Correlations in Complex System. Scientific Reports. 2015, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 8143. doi: 10.1038/srep08143

12. Qian X.-Yu., Liu Y.-M., Jiang Zh.-Q., Podobnik B., Zhou W.-X., Stanley H. E. Detrended Partial Cross-Correlation Analysis of Two Nonstationary Time Series Influenced by Common External Forces. Physical Review. 2015, vol. 91, p. 06281. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.062816

13. Zhou W. X. Multifractal Detrended CrossCorrelation Analysis for Two Nonstationary Signals. Physical Review E. 2008, vol. 77, p. 066211. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.066211

14. Horvatic D., Stanley H. E., Podobnik B. Detrended Cross-Correlation Analysis for NonStationary Time Series with Periodic Trends. Europhysics Let. 2011, vol. 94, no. 1, p. 18007. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/94/18007

15. Alvarez-Ramirez J., Rodriguez E., Echeverría J. C. Detrending Fluctuation Analysis Based on Moving Average Filtering. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications. 2005, vol. 354, pp. 199–219. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2005.02.020

16. Rinn F. TSAP-Win Time Series Analysis and Presentation for Dendrochronology and Related Applications. User Reference Version 0.53. Heidelberg, Rinntech, 2005, pp. 1–88.

17. Candiago S., RemondinoF., De Giglio M., Dubbini M., Gettelli M. Article Evaluating Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices for Precision Farming Applications from UAV Images. Remote Sens. 2015, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 4026–4047. doi: 10.3390/rs70404026

18. Pyataev A. S., Vais A. A. Pine Crown and Trunk Diameter Dependence Research. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2019, pp. 160–165.