Correlation between the Orientation of Cross-Field Axes of Small-Scale Anisotropic Irregularities in Midlatitude Ionosphere and Drift Direction in the F Region

Introduction. It has been previously reported that small-scale irregularities (SSI) in the polar ionosphere are elongated along the magnetic field and anisotropic in its cross-field direction. At the same time, the largest of the SSI cross-field axes tends to orient along the SSI drift direction. However, there is no evidence of direct correlations of SSI anisotropy and ionospheric drift directions in the middle latitudes.

Objective. A direct comparison of the experimental data of SSI shape with motion parameters of irregularities was measured at the same place (Moscow) at the same time. Previously, experimentally obtained values of SSI cross-field anisotropy orientation in the midlatitude ionosphere were compared only with the neutral winds model.

Materials and methods. A tomographic approach was used to determine SSI anisotropy parameters by processing radio scintillation signals during overfly by several navigation satellites emitting on frequencies of 150 MHz and 400 MHz. Estimations were obtained of the ratio between the ellipsoid axes and cross-field anisotropy orientations in the framework of the SSI model in a form of magnetic field-oriented ellipsoids with three different dimensions along and across the Earth's magnetic field. The parameters of irregularities were obtained by selecting model parameters at a time when the calculated logarithm dispersion of the satellite signals relative amplitude during orbit is the closest to the experimentally obtained curve. Estimations were obtained of the velocity and drift direction of medium-scale irregularities (MSI) by using DPS-4 ionosonde data acquired while decametre-wave radar studies of ionosphere from the Earth's surface. Simultaneous measurements of Doppler frequency shifts and incident angles of scattered waves allowed estimations of three components of the medium-scale irregularities drift velocity to be obtained.

Results. There was evidence of a good correlation between the drift direction of medium-scale irregularities and cross-field anisotropy orientation of small-scale irregularities. The difference in the drift directions of MSI and in the orientation of the cross-field axes of SSI varied from 3 to 10 degrees (provided the spatial coincidence of the ionosphere regions where the measurements were carried out).

Conclusion. In constructing a model of the radar backscattering signal in the HF band, the correlation between the cross-field anisotropy orientation of the elongated irregularities and their drift direction can be useful when there is a lack of information on ionospheric irregularities.

1. Bryunelli B. E., Namgaladze A. A. Fizika ionosfery [Ionosphere Physics]. Moscow, Nauka, 1988, 526 p. (In Russ.)

2. Al'pert Ya. L. Rasprostranenie elektromagnitnykh voln i ionosfera [Propagation of Electromagnetic Waves and Ionosphere]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Nauka, 1972, 564 p. (In Russ.)

3. International Reference Ionosphere. Available at: http://irimodel.org (accessed 21.07.2019)

4. Shubin V. N., Karpachev A. T., Telegin V. A., Tsybulya K. G. SMF2 Global Model of F2 Layer Peak Maximum From Satellite and Ground-Based Observation. Available at: http://smf2.izmiran.ru (accessed 21.07.2019)

5. Gershman B. N., Kazimirovskii E. S., Kokourov V. D., Chernobrovkina N. A. Yavlenie F-rasseyaniya v ionosfere [The F-Scattering Phenomenon in the Ionosphere]. Moscow, Nauka, 1984, 140 p. (In Russ.)

6. Panchenko V. A., Telegin V. A., Vorob’ev V. G., Zhbankov G. A., Yagodkina O. I., Rozhdestvenskaya V. I. Spread F in the Midlatitude Ionosphere According to DPS-4 Ionosonde Data. Geomagnetizm i Aeronomiya. 2018, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 241–249.

7. Yasyukevich Yu. V., Zhivet'ev I. V., Yasyukevich A. S., Voeikov S. V., Zakharov V. I., Perevalova N. P., Titkov N. N. Influence of Ionospheric and Magnetospheric Disturbances on Failures of Global Navigation Satellite Systems. Current Problems in Remote Sensing of the Earth from Space. 2017, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 88–98. (In Russ.)

8. Nasyrov A. M. Rasseyanie radiovoln anizotropnymi ionosfernymi neodnorodnostyami [Radio Wave Scattering by Anisotropic Ionospheric Inhomogeneities]. Kazan, Izdvo Kazanskogo un-ta, 1991, 150 p. (In Russ.)

9. Sergeev E. N., Zykov E. Yu., Akchurin A. D., Nasyrov I. A., Vertogradov G. G., Vertogradov V. G., Kim V. Yu., Polimatidi V. P., Grach S. M. The Results of Comprehensive Studies of the Perturbed Region of the Ionosphere Using a Short-Wavelength Location in a Wide Frequency Band and Artificial Radiation of the Ionosphere. Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics. 2012, vol. 55, no. 1/2, pp. 79–93. (In Russ.)

10. Tereshchenko E. D., Khudukon B. Z., Kozlova M. O., Nygren T. Anisotropy of Ionospheric Irregularities Determined from the Amplitude of Satellite Signals at a Single Receiver. Ann. Geophysicae. 1999, vol. 17, pp. 508–518.

11. Livingston R. S., Rino C. L., Owen J., Tsunoda R. T. The Anisotropy of High-Latitude Nighttime F Region Irregularities. J. Geophys. Res. 1982, vol. 87, no. 12, pp. 10519–10526.

12. Digisonde4DManual_LDI-web1-2-6. Technical Manual. Ver. 1.2.6. Available at: http://digisonde.com/dps-4dmanual.html (accessed 21.07.2019)

13. Reinisch B. W., Galkin I. A., Khmyrov G. M., Kozlov A. V., Bibl K., Lisysyan I. A., Cheney G. P., Huang X., Kitrosser D. F., Paznukhov V. V., Luo Y., Jones W., Stelmash S., Hamel R., Grochmal J. The New Digisonde for Research and Monitoring Applications. Radio Sci. 2009. 2009, vol. 44, iss. 1. doi: 10.1029/2008RS004115

14. Available at: http://147.231.47.3 (accessed 21.07.2019)

15. Galushko V. G., Kascheev A. S., Paznukhov V. V., Yampolski Yu. M., Reinisch B. W. Frequency-and-Angular Sounding of Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances in the Model of Three-Dimensional Electron Density Waves. Radio Sci. 2008, vol. 43, iss. 4. doi: 10.1029/2007RS003735

16. Rytov S. M., Kravtsov Yu. A., Tatarskii V. I. Vvedenie v statisticheskuyu radiofiziku. Ch. 2. Sluchainye polya [Introduction to Statistical Radiophysics. Part 2. Random Fields.]. Moscow, Nauka, 1978, 463 p. (In Russ.)

17. Tereshchenko E. D., Khudukon B. Z., Kozlova M. O., Evstafiev O. V., Nygren T., Brekke A. Comparison of the Orientation of Small Scale Electron Density Irregularities And F Region Plasma Flow Direction. Ann. Geophysicae. 2000, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 918–926.

18. Tereshchenko E. D., Khudukon B. Z., Kozlova M. O., Evstafiev O. V., Nygren T. Anisotropy of Ionospheric Irregularities Determined from the Amplitude of Satellite Signals at a Singlereciver. Ann. Geophysicae. 1999, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 508–518.

19. Tereshchenko E. D., Romanova N. Yu., Koustov A. V. VHF Scintillations, Orientation of the Anisotropy of F-region Irregularities and Direction of Plasma Convection in the Polar Cap. Annales Geophysicae. 2008, vol. 26, iss. 7, pp. 1725–1730. doi: 10.5194/angeo-26-1725-2008

20. Tereshchenko E. D., Romanova N. Yu., Kustov A. V. Comparison of Transverse to Magnetic Field Anisotropy of Small-Scale Inhomogeneities with Ionospheric Convection According to SuperDARN Radars. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy. 2004, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 487–492. (In Russ.)

21. Romanova N. Yu. The Relationship Between the Direction of the Horizontal Wind and the Orientation of the Transverse Anisotropy of Small-Scale Inhomogeneities in the F Region of the Mid-Latitude Ionosphere. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy. 2017, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 463–471.

22. Telegin V. A., Romanova N. Yu., Panchenko V. A., Zhbankov G. N. Ob orientatsii poperechnoi anizotropii melkomasshtabnykh neodnorodnostei F-oblasti v napravlenii dreifa nad Moskvoi v yanvare 2014 goda [On the Orientation of the Transverse Anisotropy of Small-Scale Inhomogeneities of the F-Region in the Direction of Drift over Moscow in January 2014]. Physics of Auroral Phenomena, Abstracts of 42nd Annual Seminar 11–15 March, 2019, Apatity, p. 58. (In Russ.)