INVESTIGATION OF EEG SIGNAL LENGTH INFLUENCE ON ACCURACY OF ANESTHESIA LEVELS CLASSIFICATION
https://doi.org/10.32603/1993-8985-2018-21-6-111-117
Abstract
This paper considers one of the challenging tasks during surgical procedure, i.e. depth of anasthesia estimate. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of the analyzed EEG signal fragment duration on the accuracy of anesthesia level estimate using the linear discriminant analysis algorithm and determining the EEG signal length, which yields acceptable accuracy of anesthesia level separation using these parameters.
A new method for classifying EEG anesthesia levels is proposed. The possibility of classifying levels of anesthesia is demonstrated by means of sharing the EEG parameters under consideration (SE, BSR, SEF95, RBR).
The method can be used in anesthesia monitors that are used to monitor the depth of anesthesia in order to select the appropriate dose of anesthetic drugs during operations, thus avoiding both cases of intraoperative arousal and excessively deep anesthesia.
About the Authors
Mokhammed A. Al-GhailiRussian Federation
Mokhammed A. Al-Ghaili – postgraduate student of the Department of Biotechnical Systems of Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI". The author of 5 scientific publications. Area of expertise: digital processing of biomedical signals; machine learning; pattern recognition.
Alexander N. Kalinichenko
Russian Federation
Alexander N. Kalinichenko – D.Sc. in Engineering (2009), Professor of the Department of Biotechnical Systems of Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI". The author of more than 160 scientific publications. Area of expertise: computer analysis of biomedical signals; machine learning; pattern recognition.
Mokhammed R. Qaid
Russian Federation
Mokhammed R. Qaid – Master’s Degree in Biotechnical Systems and Technologies (2018, Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI"). Area of expertise: digital processing of biomedical signals.
References
1. Amin H. U. , Mumtaz W., Subhani A. R., Saad M. N. M., Malik A. S. Classification of EEG Signals Based on Pattern Recognition Approach. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 2017, vol. 11, art.103, pp. 1–12.
2. Thornton C., Jones J. G. Evaluating Depth of Anesthesia: Review of Methods. International Anesthesiology Clinics. 1993, vol. 31, iss.4, pp. 67–88.
3. Domino K. B., Posner K. L., Caplan R. A., Cheney F. W. Awareness During Anesthesia: a Closed Claims Analysis. Anesthesiology. 1999, vol. 90, pp. 1053–1061.
4. Shalbaf R., Behnam H., Sleigh J. W., Steyn-Ross A., Voss L. J. Monitoring the Depth of Anesthesia Using Entropy Features and an Artificial Neural Network. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2013, vol. 218, iss. 1, pp. 17–24.
5. Lee B., Won D., Seo K., Kim H. J., Lee S. Classification of Wakefulness and Anesthetic Sedation Using Combination Feature of EEG and ECG. Proc. of 2017 5th International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI). Sabuk, South Korea, 9–11 Jan. 2017. Piscataway: IEEE, 2017, pp. 88–90. doi: 10.1109/IWWBCI.2017.7858168
6. Tong S., Thakor N. V. Quantitative EEG Analysis Methods and Clinical Applications. Norwood: Artech House, 2009, 421 p.
7. Benzy V. K., Jasmin E. A., Koshy R. C., Amal F. Wavelet Entropy Based Classification of Depth of Anesthesia. 2016 International Conference on Computational Techniques in Information and Communication Technologies (ICCTICT), New Delhi, India, 11–13 March 2016. Piscataway: IEEE, 2016, pp. 521–524. doi: 10.1109/ICCTICT.2016.7514635
8. Viertiö-Oja H., Maja V., Särkelä M., Talja P., Tenkanen N., Tolvanen-Laakso H., Paloheimo M., Vakkuri A., Yli-Hankala A., Meriläinen P. Description of the Entropy Algorithm as Applied in the Datex-Ohmeda S/5 Entropy Module. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2004, vol 48, iss. 2, pp. 154–161.
9. Yoon Y., Kim T., Jeong D., Park S. Monitoring the Depth of Anesthesia from Rat EEG Using Modified Shannon Entropy Analysis. 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Boston, MA, USA, 30 Aug.–3 Sept. 2011, Piscataway: IEEE, 2011, pp. 4386–4389. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091088.
10. Arslan A., Şen B., Çelebi F. V., Peker M., But A. A Comparison of Different Classification Algorithms for Determining the Depth of Anesthesia Level on a New Set of Attributes. 2015 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA), Madrid, Spain, 2–4 Sept. 2015. Piscataway: IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/INISTA.2015.7276738
11. Al-Ghaili M. A., Kalinichenko A. N. Evaluation of Depth of Anesthesia Based on Joint Analysis of EEG Frequency and Time Parameters. Izvestiya SPBGETU “LETI” [Proceedings of Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University], 2018, no. 3, pp. 80–85. (In Russian)
12. Al-Ghaili M. A. Evaluation of Deep Anesthesia Stages by Electroencephlogram Based on Spectral Analysis. Izvestiya SPBGETU “LETI” [Proceedings of Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University]. 2017. № 2. С 75–79. (In Russian)
13. Kalinichenko A. N., Manilo L. A., Nemirko A. P. Analysis of Anesthesia Stages Based on the EEG Entropy Estimation. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. Advances in Mathematical Theory and Applications. 2015, vol. 25, № 4, pp. 632–641.
14. Duda R. O., Hart P. E., Stork D. H. Pattern Classification: 2nd ed. NY: Wiley Interscience, 2001, 654 p.
Review
For citations:
Al-Ghaili M.A., Kalinichenko A.N., Qaid M.R. INVESTIGATION OF EEG SIGNAL LENGTH INFLUENCE ON ACCURACY OF ANESTHESIA LEVELS CLASSIFICATION. Journal of the Russian Universities. Radioelectronics. 2018;(6):111-117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/1993-8985-2018-21-6-111-117