Numerical Analysis of AlGaAs/InGaAs/GaAs pHEMT
https://doi.org/10.32603/1993-8985-2025-28-3-116-128
Abstract
Introduction. In most technological processes, the parameters of transistors may exhibit variations in values. As a result, integrated circuit (IC) parameters may spread beyond the nominal values stated in the technological specification. Parametric reliability of the designed devices is an important goal of parametric analysis based on simulation. This paper presents a numerical analysis of a pseudomorphic GaAs/AlGaAs/InGaAs high electron mobility transistor conducted in the TCAD environment. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the drain and transfer characteristics taking into account 10% deviations from the pHEMT parameters specified by the manufacturer. High-frequency properties of the simulated pHEMT are evaluated. The effect of the spacer thickness on the drain and drain-gate characteristics is analyzed. The work is based on a large amount of experimental data.
Aim. Numerical analysis of a pseudomorphic AlGaAs/InGaAs/GaAs high electron mobility transistor in the TCAD environment.
Materials and methods. The simulation approach involved solving the fundamental equations of semiconductor electronics using numerical analysis methods. A hydrodynamic two-dimensional numerical pHEMT model was used, which takes into account the influence of quantum wells, the effects of non-stationary dynamics, and the phenomena of charge carrier transport. The experimental data of pHEMT were obtained at the production facility of JSC Svetlana-Rost.
Results. The conducted parametric analysis revealed the concentration of the AlGaAs donor layer to be a critical parameter having a significant impact on the characteristics of pHEMT transistors. Changes in the channel length, gate length, and gate depth in the GaAs layer have a less pronounced effect on the electrical characteristics of pHEMT. The drain and drain-gate characteristics of the numerical model of pHEMT demonstrated a high degree of agreement with the experimental data. The experimental and calculated I–V characteristics obtained by varying the thickness of the spacer layer made it possible to clarify the value of the spacer thickness implemented in production conditions. As part of this analysis, the dependence of the cutoff frequency on the gate voltage was obtained.
Conclusion. The conducted analysis revealed the parameters affecting the characteristics of the numerical model of GaAs/AlGaAs/InGaAs pHEMT. Critical deviations of the studied characteristics were detected as a result of 10 % variation in the concentration of the AlGaAs donor layer. The analysis of experimental and calculated I–V characteristics, under varied spacer values, established the spacer thickness which showed agreement with the experimental structures. Parametric stability is a critical aspect in the production of microelectronic devices, affecting reliability, durability, performance, and compliance with standards. Improved parametric stability reduces the level of defects and optimizes production processes.
About the Authors
A. V. SapozhnikovRussian Federation
Alexander V. Sapozhnikov, Master’s degree in Electronics and nanoelectronics (2023), Postgraduate student of the Department of Physical Electronics and Technology; engineer
The author of 2 scientific publications. Area of expertise: microwave; modeling of solid-state electronics devices; HEMT.
27, Engelsa Ave., St Petersburg 194156
I. S. Pushnitsa
Russian Federation
Iliya S. Pushnitsa, Specialist in fundamental radiophysics and physical electronics (2004), leading design engineer
The author of 9 scientific publications. Area of expertise: mi- crowave; technology and modeling of semiconductor devices, MMIС development; HEMT.
27, Engelsa Ave., St Petersburg 194156
A. L. Dudin
Russian Federation
Anatoliy L. Dudin, Specialist in physics and technology of semiconductor devices (1996), Chief Technologist
The author of more than 30 scientific publications. Area of expertise: microwave; technology of semiconductor devices; HEMT.
27, Engelsa Ave., St Petersburg 194156
V. V. Perepelovskiy
Russian Federation
Vadim V. Perepelovskiy, Cand. Sci. (Eng.) (1992), Associate Professor (1995) of the Department of Physical Electronics and Technologies
The author of more than 30 scientific publications. Area of expertise: simulation of solid-state electronics devices.
5 F, Professor Popov St., St Petersburg 197022
References
1. Aadit M. N. A., Kirtania S. G., Afrin F., Alam M. K., Khosru Q. D. M. High Electron Mobility Transistors: Performance Analysis, Research Trend and Applications. Different Types of Field-Effect Transistors-Theory and Applications. Ed. by M. M. Pejovic, M. M. Pejovic. In Tech, 2017, pp. 45–64. doi: 10.5772/67796
2. Akgiray A. H., Weinreb S., Leblanc R., Renvoise M., Frijlink P., Lai R., Sarkozy S. Noise Measurements of Discrete HEMT Transistors and Application to Wideband Very Low-Noise Amplifiers. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. 2013, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 3285–3297. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2013.2273757
3. Quaglia R., Camarchia V., Jiang T., Pirola M., Guerrieri S. D., Loran B. K-band GaAs MMIC Doherty Power Amplifier for Microwave Radio with Optimized Driver. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. 2014, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 2518–2525. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2014.2360395
4. Crupi G., Raffo A., Avolio G., Bosi G., Sivverini G., Palomba F., Vannini G. Nonlinear Modeling of GaAs pHEMTs for Millimeter-Wave Mixer Design. Solid-State Electronics. 2015, vol. 104, pp. 25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.sse.2014.11.001
5. Yang J., Wang L., Li L., Zhan J., Xie Y. F., Zhan M. Z. An Ultra‐Wideband Distributed Amplifier MMICs Based on 0.15‐um GaAs pHEMT Technology. Intern. J. of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields. 2020, vol. 33, no. 3, art. no. e2605. doi: 10.1002/jnm.2605
6. Mei X., Yoshida W., Lange M., Lee J., Zhou J., Liu P. H., Deal W. R. First Demonstration of Amplification at 1 THz Using 25-nm InP High Electron Mobility Transistor Process. IEEE Electron Device Let. 2015, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 327–329. doi: 10.1109/LED.2015.2407193
7. Karpov S. N. Method for Predicting the Characteristics of Transistor Gaas-Heterostructures and Hemts Transistors Based on Them. Electronic Engineering. Series 1: Microwave Engineering. 2023, no. 2 (558), pp. 61–69. (In Russ.)
8. SentaurusTM Device User Guide, Ver. T-2022. 03. Available at: https://www.synopsys.com/support/licensing-installation-computeplatforms/synopsysdocumentation.html (accessed 25.03.2024).
9. Shevchenko S. A., Ivanov B. V., Smirnov A. A., Ilyin V. A., Afanasyev A. V., Sergushichev K. A. Experimental Study of a Low-Voltage 4H-SiC Drift Step Recovery Diode. IEEE Conf. of Russ. Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus), St Petersburg, Moscow, Russia, 27–30 Jan. 2020. IEEE, 2020, pp. 1004–1006. doi: 10.1109/EIConRus49466.2020.9039004
10. Kolovskiy Yu. V., Levitskiy A. A., Marinushkin P. S. Computer Modeling of MEMS Components. Problems of Developing Advanced Microand Nanoelectronic Systems. 2008, no. 1, pp. 398–401. (In Russ.)
11. Verma N., Gupta M., Gupta R. S., Jogi J. Quantum Modeling of Nanoscale Symmetric Double-Gate InAlAs/InGaAs/InP HEMT. J. of Semiconductor Technology and Science. 2013, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 342–354. doi: 10.5573/JSTS.2013.13.4.342
12. Hao H. L., Su M. Y., Wu H. T., Mei H. Y., Yao R. X., Liu F., Sun S. X. Influence of Double InGaAs/InAs Channel on DC and RF Performances of InP-Based HEMTs. J. of Ovonic Research. 2022, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 411–419. doi: 10.15251/JOR.2022.183.411
13. Li J., Pourkabirian A., Bergsten J., Wadefalk N., Grahn J. Influence of Spacer Thickness on the Noise Performance in InP HEMTs for Cryogenic LNAs. IEEE Electron Device Let. 2022, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1029–1032. doi: 10.1109/LED.2022.3178613
14. Ma S. F., Li L., Kong Q. B., Xu Y., Liu Q. M., Zhang S., Hao X. D. Atomic-Scale Insights of Indium Segregation and Its Suppression by GaAs Insertion Layer in InGaAs/AlGaAs Multiple Quantum Wells. Chinese Physics B. 2023, vol. 32, no. 3, art. no. 037801. doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/ac70b5
15. Huang Y., Shklovskii B. I., Zudov M. A. Scattering Mechanisms in State-of-the-Art GaAs/AlGaAs Quantum Wells. Physical Review Materials. 2022, vol. 6, no. 6, art. no. L061001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.L061001
16. Pattnaik G., Mohapatra M. Design of AlGaAs/InGaAs/GaAs-Based PHEMT for High Frequency Application. Proc. of Intern. Conf. on Communication, Circuits, and Systems. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Vol. 728. Springer, Singapore, 2021, pp. 329–337. doi: 10.1007/978-981-33-4866-0_41
17. Hwang E. H., Das Sarma S. Limit to TwoDimensional Mobility in Modulation-Doped GaAs Quantum Structures: How to Achieve a Mobility of 100 Million. Phys. Rev. B. 2008, vol. 77, no. 23, art. no. 235437. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.235437
18. Shieh H. M., Hsu W. C., Kao M. J., Wu C. L. Influences of δ‐Doping Time and Spacer Thickness on the Mobility and Two‐Dimensional Electron Gas Concentration in δ‐Doped GaAs/InGaAs/GaAs Pseudomorphic Heterostructures. J. of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena. 1994, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 154–157. doi:10.1116/1.587174
19. Gao H. C., Yin Z. J. Theoretical and Experimental Optimization of InGaAs Channels in GaAs PHEMT Structure. Chinese Physics Let. 2015, vol. 32, no. 6, art. no. 068102. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/32/6/068102
Review
For citations:
Sapozhnikov A.V., Pushnitsa I.S., Dudin A.L., Perepelovskiy V.V. Numerical Analysis of AlGaAs/InGaAs/GaAs pHEMT. Journal of the Russian Universities. Radioelectronics. 2025;28(3):116-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/1993-8985-2025-28-3-116-128